Some review policies:

Each submitted paper will be reviewed by a reviewer. There will be at least one or more reviewers who will review the submitted papers.
The review process uses Single-blind Review where the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.
In the review process, reviewers consider the suitability of the title, abstract, discussion (findings) and conclusion. In addition, reviewers also consider novelty, scientific impact and references used in the paper.
The reviewers' responses will be the basis for the Editor to conclude:

Accept Submission
Revision Required
Resubmit for review
Resubmit elsewhere
Reject Submission
An article is rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:

The article does not fit the scope of the journal.
The article does not follow scientific writing rules or author guidelines.
Fundamental methodological errors.
The author refuses to provide suggestions for improvement given by the reviewer without a logical basis.
There are indications of plagiarism of more than 25%.
Accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal's peer-reviewing process. The editor will decide on the acceptance of the article according to the Reviewer's comments. Articles sent back to the author for revision must be returned to the editor immediately. Revised articles returned after 20 days will be considered as new submissions. Revised articles can be submitted to the editor via the Online Submission Interface on our online Journal website.

All articles published in Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We continue to work with our author community to select the best license option, which is currently set for this journal as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.